<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zuckerberg&#8217;s Notebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philmorle.com/index.php/zuckerbergs-notebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philmorle.com/index.php/zuckerbergs-notebook/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: angusf</title>
		<link>http://philmorle.com/index.php/zuckerbergs-notebook/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>angusf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philmorle.com/index.php/zuckerbergs-notebook/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Love the phrase "simple is difficult" and agree it's really hard.

Not convinced that Facebook is simple though. It's too complex for the value I get out of it, too demanding &#38; third party apps compound the complexity.

Twitter is a much better example to my mind, it does one thing "status update" better than Facebook. I wonder what Evan Williams’ notebooks look like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the phrase &#8220;simple is difficult&#8221; and agree it&#8217;s really hard.</p>
<p>Not convinced that Facebook is simple though. It&#8217;s too complex for the value I get out of it, too demanding &amp; third party apps compound the complexity.</p>
<p>Twitter is a much better example to my mind, it does one thing &#8220;status update&#8221; better than Facebook. I wonder what Evan Williams’ notebooks look like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
